Coroutines Rule Set
The coroutines rule set analyzes code for potential coroutines problems.
CoroutineLaunchedInTestWithoutRunTest
Detect coroutine launches from @Test
functions outside a runTest
block.
Launching coroutines in tests without using runTest
could potentially swallow exceptions,
altering test results or causing crashes on other unrelated tests.
Active by default: No
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
@Test
fun `test that launches a coroutine`() {
val scope = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.Unconfined)
scope.launch {
suspendFunction()
}
}
Compliant Code:
@Test
fun `test that launches a coroutine`() = runTest {
launch {
suspendFunction()
}
}
GlobalCoroutineUsage
Report usages of GlobalScope.launch
and GlobalScope.async
. It is highly discouraged by the Kotlin documentation:
Global scope is used to launch top-level coroutines which are operating on the whole application lifetime and are not cancelled prematurely.
Application code usually should use an application-defined CoroutineScope. Using async or launch on the instance of GlobalScope is highly discouraged.
Active by default: No
Noncompliant Code:
fun foo() {
GlobalScope.launch { delay(1_000L) }
}
Compliant Code:
val scope = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.Default)
fun foo() {
scope.launch { delay(1_000L) }
}
fun onDestroy() {
scope.cancel()
}
InjectDispatcher
Always use dependency injection to inject dispatchers for easier testing. This rule is based on the recommendation https://developer.android.com/kotlin/coroutines/coroutines-best-practices#inject-dispatchers
Active by default: Yes - Since v1.21.0
Requires Type Resolution
Configuration options:
-
dispatcherNames
(default:['IO', 'Default', 'Unconfined']
)The names of dispatchers to detect by this rule
Noncompliant Code:
fun myFunc() {
coroutineScope(Dispatchers.IO)
}
Compliant Code:
fun myFunc(dispatcher: CoroutineDispatcher = Dispatchers.IO) {
coroutineScope(dispatcher)
}
class MyRepository(dispatchers: CoroutineDispatcher = Dispatchers.IO)
RedundantSuspendModifier
suspend
modifier should only be used where needed, otherwise the function can only be used from other suspending
functions. This needlessly restricts use of the function and should be avoided by removing the suspend
modifier
where it's not needed.
Active by default: Yes - Since v1.21.0
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
suspend fun normalFunction() {
println("string")
}
Compliant Code:
fun normalFunction() {
println("string")
}
SleepInsteadOfDelay
Report usages of Thread.sleep
in suspending functions and coroutine blocks. A thread can
contain multiple coroutines at one time due to coroutines' lightweight nature, so if one
coroutine invokes Thread.sleep
, it could potentially halt the execution of unrelated coroutines
and cause unpredictable behavior.
Active by default: Yes - Since v1.21.0
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
suspend fun foo() {
Thread.sleep(1_000L)
}
Compliant Code:
suspend fun foo() {
delay(1_000L)
}
SuspendFunInFinallySection
Report usage of suspending functions within a finally
section that are not enclosed in a non-cancellable context.
Without a non-cancellable context, these functions will not execute if the parent coroutine is cancelled.
Active by default: No
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
launch {
try {
suspendingWork()
} finally {
suspendingCleanup()
}
}
Compliant Code:
launch {
try {
suspendingWork()
} finally {
withContext(NonCancellable) { suspendingCleanup() }
}
}
SuspendFunSwallowedCancellation
suspend
functions should not be called inside runCatching
's lambda block, because runCatching
catches all the
Exception
s. For Coroutines to work in all cases, developers should make sure to propagate CancellationException
exceptions. This means CancellationException
should never be:
- caught and swallowed (even if logged)
- caught and propagated to external systems
- caught and shown to the user
they must always be rethrown in the same context.
Using runCatching
increases this risk of mis-handling cancellation. If you catch and don't rethrow all the
CancellationException
, your coroutines are not cancelled even if you cancel their CoroutineScope
.
This can very easily lead to:
- unexpected crashes
- extremely hard to diagnose bugs
- memory leaks
- performance issues
- battery drain
See reference, Kotlin doc.
If your project wants to use runCatching
and Result
objects, it is recommended to write a coRunCatching
utility function which immediately re-throws CancellationException
; and forbid runCatching
and suspend
combinations by activating this rule.
Active by default: No
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
@Throws(IllegalStateException::class)
suspend fun bar(delay: Long) {
check(delay <= 1_000L)
delay(delay)
}
suspend fun foo() {
runCatching {
bar(1_000L)
}
}
Compliant Code:
@Throws(IllegalStateException::class)
suspend fun bar(delay: Long) {
check(delay <= 1_000L)
delay(delay)
}
suspend fun foo() {
try {
bar(1_000L)
} catch (e: IllegalStateException) {
// handle error
}
}
// Alternate
@Throws(IllegalStateException::class)
suspend fun foo() {
bar(1_000L)
}
SuspendFunWithCoroutineScopeReceiver
Suspend functions that use CoroutineScope
as receiver should not be marked as suspend
.
A CoroutineScope
provides structured concurrency via its coroutineContext
. A suspend
function also has its own coroutineContext
, which is now ambiguous and mixed with the
receiver`s.
See https://kotlinlang.org/docs/coroutines-basics.html#scope-builder-and-concurrency
Active by default: No
Requires Type Resolution
Aliases: SuspendFunctionOnCoroutineScope
Noncompliant Code:
suspend fun CoroutineScope.foo() {
launch {
delay(1.seconds)
}
}
Compliant Code:
fun CoroutineScope.foo() {
launch {
delay(1.seconds)
}
}
// Alternative
suspend fun foo() = coroutineScope {
launch {
delay(1.seconds)
}
}
SuspendFunWithFlowReturnType
Functions that return Flow
from kotlinx.coroutines.flow
should not be marked as suspend
.
Flows
are intended to be cold observable streams. The act of simply invoking a function that
returns a Flow
, should not have any side effects. Only once collection begins against the
returned Flow
, should work actually be done.
See https://kotlinlang.org/docs/flow.html#flows-are-cold
Active by default: Yes - Since v1.21.0
Requires Type Resolution
Noncompliant Code:
suspend fun observeSignals(): Flow<Unit> {
val pollingInterval = getPollingInterval() // Done outside of the flow builder block.
return flow {
while (true) {
delay(pollingInterval)
emit(Unit)
}
}
}
private suspend fun getPollingInterval(): Long {
// Return the polling interval from some repository
// in a suspending manner.
}
Compliant Code:
fun observeSignals(): Flow<Unit> {
return flow {
val pollingInterval = getPollingInterval() // Moved into the flow builder block.
while (true) {
delay(pollingInterval)
emit(Unit)
}
}
}
private suspend fun getPollingInterval(): Long {
// Return the polling interval from some repository
// in a suspending manner.
}